Note: You are seeing this message either because your browser has not loaded our stylesheets, or because your browser does not support stylesheets (CSS). Please upgrade to a relatively modern browser to improve your experience. Not sure what to upgrade to? Try Firefox.
The Science Advisory Board
Screen Name: 
 
Password: 
 

Perspectives

only search SAB perspectives

Are you interested in submitting a Perspective Article? Be sure to read The Science Advisory Board's Editorial Guides for Perspective Articles. Click here.


Special Topics Focus: RNAi Technology
Tools and Techniques of RNA Interference

by Jean-Claude Zenklusen, M.S., Ph.D.

Disruptive (also known as repressive or interference) techniques have been very useful in the field of reverse genetics to help in the functional elucidation of newly discovered genes. This approach is based on the idea that by producing cells or whole organisms lacking the gene of interest, one can determine its function and co-effectors by studying the metabolic defects occurred on the test subjects.

Although this approach has been successfully utilized in the creation of Knockout animals for several different genes, the technique has serious limitations:
  • Not all genes can be inactivated in every cell in a subject animal, since in some cases the complete absence of it will result in lethality either at early stages of gestation or shortly after birth. These animals do give some information on the function of the target gene, but results in very restrained data.
  • In the cases where lethality is not caused by the absence of the desired gene, it has been found that the organism metabolic response does differ, markedly in some cases, from the normal counterpart in pathways that have no direct relation to the gene in question. This effect has been characterized as being the result of adaptation to the lack of the investigated gene from an early stage. Although these animals do provide a wealth of information, occasionally these data have no easy correlate to the more common spontaneous loss of a gene only in a certain cell population that occurs in the case of disease.
  • The high cost and incertitude factors in producing these animals make this approach unviable for the intent of studying a certain gene in the context of only one type of cells in culture. Even when whole organism experiments are envisioned, only very well funded laboratories can use these techniques.
One solution to this problem has been found in the creation of knock-out animals using regulable promoters (Tetracyclin-inducible promoters), or conditional vectors that are activated after crossing of the carrier with another animal producing a recombination enzyme (cre-lox system).

Even if these approaches have helped in circumventing some of the problem aforementioned, they do have difficulties on their own (such as leakyness of the tet promoter, and cost of double transgenics in the cre-lox) that make them unusable for cell based assays.

With the discovery of small interference RNA (siRNA), a new horizon has opened in the reverse genetics field using cell based experimental systems. This new technology allows researchers to transfect a small double stranded duplex of RNA homologous to any target gene and accelerate its degradation through the enzymes of the RNAi Silencing complex. This approach effectively negates the expression of the targeted gene at a fraction of the cost of Knock-out production, and more importantly in a way which does not allow the cells to adapt, mimicking more closely the pathological state of disease.

siRNA can be used as a standard reagent in which double strand RNA duplexes are transiently transfected into the cell type to be studied, or as an engineered plasmid containing a hairpin loop structure that will give rise to the dsRNA duplexes in vivo after stable transfection.

This last approach has the potential for producing transgenic animals that will produce the siRNA in vivo in certain tissues according to the promoter with which they are outfitted; effectively producing a regulated, conditional, knock-out organism.

******************************

Dr. Zenklusen has been a member of The Science Advisory Board since 1997.

******************************
To discuss this perspective or RNAi technology, visit the Discussion Forum.

###

<< Previous    Next >>   

[ View All Perspectives ]

Scientific & Medical
Experts Needed!

The Science Advisory Board is the world's most established network of life scientists!

Voice your opinions on companies, products, protocols and even humor in a lively, real-time, interactive Online Community of over 41,000 life science & medical professionals.

Redeem generous rewards for participation in studies, contributing website content and referring colleagues.

Join Right Now!
(It's Free!)

Search This Site
only search scienceboard.net
only search Forums
What's this?